Cagiva Mito viritys/tekniikka

Google translate kirjoitti:In the end I am obliged to write even a chapter dedicated to testing and
Myth of the test.
A Myth repowering up to about 25-26CV to the wheel. Top
performance are the old Myth 2 and the first Mito ev with Mikuni 35, over
Racing to the old myth.
Speech must be done separately for Myth tested by magazines. These motion
normally (the speech is also valid in general) are subject to a
set-point. To have the original muffler (not always ...), the
filter box and probably the carburetor. Myth 2 The'93 tested by
Motorcycle Racing (October 1993) has reported 31.1 hp at the wheel and 11.500giri
came out from the base of 400 m starting from standstill in 14.3 sa 146.3 km / h. Ever
Myth 2 of the'93 tested by MOTOSPRINT test / comparison with the Cagiva 500 GP
at Mugello has reported 32.75 HP to the wheel to 11,000 rpm, acceleration 0 --
400 in 14.2 seconds with output rate of 150.5 km / h, top speed 174.2 km / h
(say from the photos that the Mito head mounted muffler is not a standard, in fact
did not seem made of pressed steel ...). Even better was a Myth
ev with Mikuni 35 tested by "In Moto" with 34.7 hp to the wheel and 176 km / h
maximum speed.
Working on the engine you can get a lot more HP also
Myth standard. A cylinder with 73,037 original series up to
almost 34 hp to the wheel (replacing the original carburetor and muffler).

Tests made at different times on my Myth I only have a chart of when
I carried out the tests, I think in 2002, to verify the performance of the new
head (Figure 2). Although the engine had come to the end of life and
need a comprehensive review, the results were more than buoni.

La test configuration:
• crankcase has about 38,000 km;
• 73037 cylinder series with about 20,000 km;
• monofascia Vertex piston with around 8,000 km;
• strip monopetalo carbon originals;
• carburetor Dell'Orto VHSA 32;
• chain standards;
• the test was done on my Myth after a winter of more than
three months, with no change in carburetion or another (and set in motion
raised to the bench).
Were performed three tests in 5 gear, the power was found to
wheel: 1st test 32.0 HP, 31.8 HP 2nd and 3rd test 32.2 HP).

The_Pake kirjoitti:Paljonko näillä pitäs mennä:
-mikuni 35mm kaasari
-35mm imukaula
-pipercross ilmansuodatin
-Boyesen teholäpät
-jollymoton street tehari?

Nouseeko kulutus paljonkin virien myötä vai pysyykö suunnilleen samana? Entä paljonko tehoa olisi suunnilleen?

The_Pake kirjoitti:

The_Pake kirjoitti:Paljonko näillä pitäs mennä:
-mikuni 35mm kaasari
-35mm imukaula
-pipercross ilmansuodatin
-Boyesen teholäpät
-jollymoton street tehari?

Nouseeko kulutus paljonkin virien myötä vai pysyykö suunnilleen samana? Entä paljonko tehoa olisi suunnilleen?

Aramid kirjoitti:Näitä tehoja on aika vaikea arvioida. Jokaisella tuntuu olevan oma mielipide.

Tässä on jotain fakotja italialisesta Mito info pdf:stä cmc foorumeilta:

Google translate kirjoitti:In the end I am obliged to write even a chapter dedicated to testing and
Myth of the test.
A Myth repowering up to about 25-26CV to the wheel. Top
performance are the old Myth 2 and the first Mito ev with Mikuni 35, over
Racing to the old myth.
Speech must be done separately for Myth tested by magazines. These motion
normally (the speech is also valid in general) are subject to a
set-point. To have the original muffler (not always ...), the
filter box and probably the carburetor. Myth 2 The'93 tested by
Motorcycle Racing (October 1993) has reported 31.1 hp at the wheel and 11.500giri
came out from the base of 400 m starting from standstill in 14.3 sa 146.3 km / h. Ever
Myth 2 of the'93 tested by MOTOSPRINT test / comparison with the Cagiva 500 GP
at Mugello has reported 32.75 HP to the wheel to 11,000 rpm, acceleration 0 --
400 in 14.2 seconds with output rate of 150.5 km / h, top speed 174.2 km / h
(say from the photos that the Mito head mounted muffler is not a standard, in fact
did not seem made of pressed steel ...). Even better was a Myth
ev with Mikuni 35 tested by "In Moto" with 34.7 hp to the wheel and 176 km / h
maximum speed.
Working on the engine you can get a lot more HP also
Myth standard. A cylinder with 73,037 original series up to
almost 34 hp to the wheel (replacing the original carburetor and muffler).

Tests made at different times on my Myth I only have a chart of when
I carried out the tests, I think in 2002, to verify the performance of the new
head (Figure 2). Although the engine had come to the end of life and
need a comprehensive review, the results were more than buoni.

La test configuration:
• crankcase has about 38,000 km;
• 73037 cylinder series with about 20,000 km;
• monofascia Vertex piston with around 8,000 km;
• strip monopetalo carbon originals;
• carburetor Dell'Orto VHSA 32;
• chain standards;
• the test was done on my Myth after a winter of more than
three months, with no change in carburetion or another (and set in motion
raised to the bench).
Were performed three tests in 5 gear, the power was found to
wheel: 1st test 32.0 HP, 31.8 HP 2nd and 3rd test 32.2 HP).

Tossa vielä yhen Miton dyno paperit, siinä siis ilmeisesti 35mm Mikuni ja Jollymoto:http://www.motot.net/galleria/showphoto.php/photo/197125/cpage/2/si/mito%20teho/what/allfields#poststart

Tossa sun esimerkissä eniten kuristaa toi 28mm dellorto. 66650E kaipaisi 35mm mikunin tai mahdollisesti 38mm Dellorton, jollainen oli 66650E:n kaverina lucky explorer Frecciassa.

Itse arvioisin noin 30hp, ehkä vähän alle.

The_Pake kirjoitti:Paljonko näillä pitäs mennä:
-mikuni 35mm kaasari
-35mm imukaula
-pipercross ilmansuodatin
-Boyesen teholäpät
-jollymoton street tehari?

Nouseeko kulutus paljonkin virien myötä vai pysyykö suunnilleen samana? Entä paljonko tehoa olisi suunnilleen?

_porkkana_ kirjoitti:Kaverin puolesta kysyisin et saaks mitoon jostain isompii pyyttyi ja paljonko sellanen maksais?

The_Pake kirjoitti:Vaikuttaako tehari ja 35mm kaasari kulutukseen paljonkin?

Temu- kirjoitti:

The_Pake kirjoitti:Vaikuttaako tehari ja 35mm kaasari kulutukseen paljonkin?

Niinkuin tietopankissa lukee että jolly + 35 = 36 hevosta

Javaq kirjoitti:

Temu- kirjoitti:

The_Pake kirjoitti:Vaikuttaako tehari ja 35mm kaasari kulutukseen paljonkin?

Niinkuin tietopankissa lukee että jolly + 35 = 36 hevosta

Kysyi kulutusta?


Ei nuo hilppeet ainakaan bensankulutusta vähennä, kyllä se vie enemmän. Mutta kaasukäsi ratkaisee tässäkin paljon.